One of the things guaranteed to provoke debate is the whole question of notice periods in freelance contracts. On the face of it, an equal right for you and the client to step out of a contract looks like a good thing to have. But are they really worth anything?
Secondly, if your client has to give you notice to leave, that implies that potentially he has to pay you for working when, in fact, there is no work for you to do: after all, if there were he wouldn’t be letting you go. That in turn implies a degree of Mutuality of Obligation above the irreducible minimum, which is one of the keystones of IR35 assessments.
However, as with most things, it’s not all about IR35.
From the client side, clearly he wants you to stay to the end of the agreed contract to do the job. Equally, he wants to be able to drop you instantly if your services are no longer required; that’s why he’s using a contractor in the first place. So notice from you and zero from him is a good thing for him.
So perhaps an asymmetric notice arrangement is the answer; you need to give him some weeks notice of leaving while he only needs give you some days. That at least covers the business risk to both parties in a reasonably fair manner and doesn’t damage your IR35 position.
But consider: elsewhere in that contract will usually be a clause that the engagement can be terminated with immediate effect at the client’s sole discretion for any number of reasons. So like it or not, you actually never do have an effective notice period from the client anyway.
So why worry about it in the first place?
By Malvolio
Image by jovike
Pingback: Contractors and Freelancer Guide to Contracts and Written Statements | Contractor Advisor